The apparent disconnect between thinking and acting

Human beings do two obvious things: think and act. Thinking itself is characterized by inaction, although it could be argued that thinking is an act in itself. For the sake of this piece, let’s say the action is characterized by the movement of the body. It is often said that thinkers do not act, nor do they act enough, like people who are doing more than they are. In other words, in some way action is more important than thought.

But what action can you take without thinking? If an action can be better than an alternative action: that is, that action generates a beneficial result, then we can certainly shred the controversy that one thought is more beneficial than another. So what is a “good” action and a “bad” action, and therefore what is a “good” thought or a “bad” thought?

Surely only God Himself can determine this objectively (as well as subjectively due to His own desires). So how do we determine what is good and what is bad? Surely, we can only do this subjectively, so what is a good thought for me may be good for you, and vice versa.

So how do we take action?

Why do we imprison murderers?

Well, our thoughts tell us to protect ourselves and others, so we take steps to do so.

The two are linked and cannot be separated.

So one’s “bad” actions stem from a “bad” thought. Even stupid actions that people do without thinking involve thought, because their actions are driven by thought, even if the thought does not include elements that are generally accepted as “smart.” So we must accept that there are different thoughts, and that more of these thoughts will subjectively decide whether the aforementioned thoughts are “good” or “bad” according to these new thoughts. So, in summary, we can say that all actions are driven by thoughts.

One of my thoughts is that the vast amount of thoughts of the entire living population is immeasurable. So, consequently, so are stocks.

Thought is the most important action that man can take, simply because it happens more often. Even if one is generally accepted as unintelligent by other people’s thoughts, everyone thinks, even if it is something as simple as “I’m bored.” I would say that even dreams are thoughts. So literally you are always thinking. So if you are always thinking, and thinking is an action, then you are always acting.

If thinking is not an action, then what is? I don’t think its importance is understood. Try to perform an action without thinking. What action did you take? You surely have a thought about this action, even if this thought is “I don’t care.” Thoughts cannot be separated from actions, so we must understand the importance of thought. Why are thoughts important? Because there are no actions without them. What is the importance of actions? What is life without them?

Therefore, all actions require thought and thoughts happen all the time. Now what is my point? Many generally accept that certain actions are not really actions because there is more thought involved and less movement. This is a fallacy because it is thought that generates action. So little movement cannot be an appropriate barometer of the quality of thought.

Take the moon landing, for example. Most of the people involved never set foot on the moon. Most of them sat at their desks all day. But the quality of his thoughts made the action of walking on the moon possible.

Imagine that.

The act of walking on the moon was made possible by thoughts.

Were they moving aimlessly?

The fact that these calculations were created by people who sat down and did not move enough to discredit their thoughts, especially considering the actions that took place as a result?

What is my point

That stationary thinking is just as important as any other action you take. Try to perform an action without thinking. He even tries to stop thinking. You can not do it. So, consider the professions you envy and try to imitate them without thinking, and see if these people aren’t “really working.” I have yet to understand why these professions are so easy, why their detractors don’t try them too. If money is an issue, try these professions you envy. If you think that lack of movement is not a real job, then try to stop moving and start thinking, and think about how hard it is to think, and get these levels that you think are so easy to get.

But his thoughts would rather eliminate the actions of others “because they are too easy”, when he has never tried them for himself.

If professional athletes are not really working and getting paid too much, if money is a goal, become a professional athlete as it is very easy.

But it is “easier” to condemn the professional athlete.

Start your own band, since you want their money and their job is very easy.

But it is easier to complain.

Actions are a reflection of thoughts.

The quality of thoughts is subjective, but in my opinion thoughts are underestimated and that certain actions (actions that require organization rather than just reflexes) are believed to be much easier than they are due to the thoughts behind they.